Vermont Town Meetings vote 14-1 against relicensing Vermont Yankee

first_imgFor complete survey findings, go to is external) on the Web.METHODOLOGYThe Civil Society Institute survey by Opinion Research Corporation was conducted February 19-22, 2010 among a sample of 802 adults comprising 399 men and 403 women 18 years of age and older living in the state of Vermont.  Completed interviews are weighted by two variables,  age and gender, to ensure reliable and accurate representation of the total state population, 18 years of age and older. The margin of error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage points.  ABOUT THE CIVIL SOCIETY INSTITUTEBased in Newton, MA, the nonprofit and nonpartisan Civil Society Institute ( is external)) is a think tank that serves as a catalyst for change by creating problem-solving interactions among people, and between communities, government and business that can help to improve society.   Since 2003, CSI has conducted more than 25 major national and state-level surveys and reports on energy and auto issues, including vehicle fuel-efficiency standards, consumer demand for hybrids/other highly-fuel efficient vehicles, global warming and renewable energy.  In addition to being a co-convener of CLEAN, the Civil Society Institute also is the parent organization of ( is external)) and the Hybrid Owners of America ( is external)).  EDITOR’S NOTE:  A streaming audio recording of the March 1, 2010 news event at which the Vermont survey results were announced is available on the Web at is external).SOURCE Civil Society Institute, Newton, MA. MONTPELIER, Vt., March 4, 2010 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ As predicted based on a survey conducted by Opinion Research Corporation (ORC) for the nonpartisan and nonprofit Civil Society Institute, the vast majority of Vermont Town Meetings deliberating this week the fate of the Vermont Yankee came out in support of closure of the controversial nuclear reactor by 2012.  The final tally of Town Meetings in Vermont opposing the relicensing of Vermont Yankee was 14-1.  The town of Rockingham was alone in passing a pro-Vermont Yankee resolution and, even then, only by a margin of three votes, according to reports.  Towns voting in favor of shutting down Vermont Yankee were: Thetford, Bristol, Fayston, Brookfield, Montgomery, Woodstock, Moretown, Waitsfield, Danville, Cabot, Huntington, Sharon, and Jamaica. Additionally, Cambridge elected to table the issue.Pam Solo, founder and president, Civil Society Institute, said:  “Our survey pointed to the likelihood that the Vermont Town Halls would come out along the lines of the earlier Vermont Senate vote to close Vermont Yankee by 2012.  With literally dozens of other reactors plagued with similar tritium leaks, we see a clear message here for a U.S. nuclear power industry:   You can’t sell Americans on the notion that you are providing ‘clean and safe’ power at the same time that you are leaking a radioactive substance into wells and other bodies of water.  Citizens in other states may not be able to intervene as directly in reactor issues as Vermonters can, but the Town Hall votes and our survey findings suggest that Americans are unlikely to remain silent about tritium leaks and other legitimate safety concerns.”The Civil Society Institute’s scientific survey of 802 adult Vermont residents was based on Opinion Research Corporation (ORC) polling that took place February 19-22nd immediately before the Vermont Senate vote on Vermont Yankee relicensing.   CSI believes that the findings resonate nationally in that a main driver of deteriorating public support for Vermont Yankee centered on the leaking of radioactive tritium, a problem that also is playing out at 27 or more of the nation’s 104 reactors across 31 states.Key survey findings reported by Opinion Research Corporation included the following:About two thirds of Vermont residents (65 percent) say “reports about Vermont Yankee leaking radioactive tritium into testing wells and surrounding water” make them “more likely to support the 2012 closure of the reactor.”  That includes 44 percent of Republicans, 80 percent of Democrats and 60 percent of Independents.  Of those Vermont residents who heard about the radioactive tritium leak at Vermont Yankee, nearly four in five (79 percent) said they are concerned about it, including more than half (52 percent) who are “very concerned.”  Only about one in five (21 percent) of this group said that they were not concerned, with just 6 percent saying they were “not concerned at all.”  Even when the 20 percent of state residents who have not heard about the tritium leak are added, the percentage of all state residents who are concerned about the tritium leaks at Vermont Yankee still accounts for 63 percent of the state’s adult population.  Overall, 71 percent of state residents are “less supportive now of Vermont Yankee, the nuclear reactor, than [they] were six months ago.”  That includes 57 percent of Republicans, 82 percent of Democrats and two thirds of Independents.  Given a choice, fewer than one in 10 Vermont residents (9 percent) would ask their power company to use nuclear energy to power their homes, compared to 71 percent who selected “wind, solar and other clean-energy technologies.”The fact that Entergy has been unable to find the source of the tritium leaks makes more than three out of fourVermont residents (76 percent) “less confident in the company’s ability to safely manage a nuclear reactor”.About half of Vermont residents (49 percent) see nuclear power as a “power source of yesterday,” compared to compared to 94 percent for solar, 92 percent for wind and 78 percent for hydroelectric as “power sources of tomorrow” that should play a bigger, rather than smaller, role in the U.S. energy supply picture.  Nine out of 10 Vermont residents (89 percent) say that Entergy — not Vermont taxpayers — “should have to foot the bill for decommissioning Vermont Yankee.”  That includes 83 percent of Republicans, 94 percent of Democrats and 90 percent of Independents.68 percent of Vermont residents would support closure of Vermont Yankee in 2012 “assuming that a combination of increased energy efficiency, clean energy, such as hydroelectric, wind and solar and natural gas could be used to offset the electricity from the reactor.”  That includes 48 percent of Republicans, 82 percent of Democrats and 63 percent of Independents.  71 percent of Vermont residents would support closure of Vermont Yankee in 2012 “assuming that many new jobs could be created through investments in new clean energy technologies, such as hydroelectric, wind and solar.” That includes 47 percent of Republicans, 86 percent of Democrats and 72 percent of Independents.  Only 46 percent of state residents trust Entergy to clean up the tritium leaks at Vermont Yankee, compared to 47 percent who do not.Two thirds of Vermonters now give Entergy a low rating for “trustworthiness” — with 37 percent saying “very low” and 29 percent “somewhat low.” Only about one in four state residents (26 percent) give Entergy high marks for trustworthiness.Nearly three out five state residents (58 percent) give Entergy low marks for “competence” — with 26 percent saying “very low” and 33 percent “somewhat low.” Fewer than one in three (29 percent) give Entergy high marks for competence.Four out of five state residents (79 percent) have heard about the tritium leaks at Vermont Yankee.  Only 20 percent have not.last_img read more

Register by July 31, Capiznon online sellers urged

first_imgIt is in line with the BIR’s “Legally Engaged Goal Oriented Individual/Non – Individual Taxpayer” or LEGIT campaign. THE Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Revenue District Office No. 72 is calling on online sellers in the province to register on or before July 31 to become legitimate online entrepreneurs. The order shall include not only partner sellers or merchants but also other stakeholders involved such as the payment gateways, delivery channels, internet service providers and other facilitators. “All those who will register their business activity and/or update their registration status not later than July 31, 2020 shall not be imposed with penalty for late registration,” said the circular. Concerned online sellers must register with their respective RDOs. (PIA Capiz/PN) The RDO will impose applicable penalties under the law and existing revenue rules and regulations to those who will be found later doing business without complying with the registration/update requirements as well as those who failed to declare past due/unpaid taxes. The directive is embodied in the BIR Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 60-2020 which underscores the obligations of persons conducting business transactions through any forms of electronic media and notice to unregistered businesses.last_img read more

Lack of execution down stretch dooms Badgers

first_imgGREG SCHMITZ/Herald photoWEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. ? When looking for reasons why the Wisconsin men?s basketball team lost its first game in a month and a half, you could look at a lot of different things.You could look to the stat sheet and the rebounding column, where the Badgers ? one of the best rebounding teams in the Big Ten ? were outrebounded for the second consecutive game.You could look at the assist-to-turnover ratio. The Badgers gave the ball up two times more than they set up their own made baskets (13 turnovers to 11 assists).You could also look at the shooting percentages. Wisconsin made just 38.5 percent of its shots for the game, including shooting worse than 35 percent in the second half.You could even look at intimidating Mackey Arena, where a packed house of wild Boilermaker backers proved once again why the Badgers have won there just once since Richard Nixon was serving his first term as president.You could look to all of those for answers, but the underlying reason is very simple: execution.?It?s such a tough place to come in and win, we practiced hard, we were ready,? forward Joe Krabbenhoft said. ?We just didn?t execute.?It was a problem for the Badgers on both ends of the court.?We did some very uncharacteristic things that we usually don?t do,? forward Brian Butch said. ?We got away with it [against] Michigan, but you don?t get away with it all the time.?Several times late in the second half, Purdue players were able to separate from Wisconsin defenders for open 3-pointers to stem Badger assaults on the Boilermaker lead.?Bodies on bodies, and just following our rules,? Butch said. ?There were a lot of open guys on a lot of 3-pointers that just seemed to put them on a run. We could have done a better job as a team defending that, it would have helped out everything.?Playing in front of a hostile road crowd for the first time since the loss to Duke, Trevon Hughes seemed to let the atmosphere get to him. Straying from the more controlled game that he displayed since returning from a late December ankle injury, Hughes turned the ball over three times in the first half on forced passes, including one in which he tried to make a decision about where to throw a pass in midair.?The one time [Hughes] jumped up in the air and threw it to Brian slipping, he jumped up in the air, and you don?t jump up in the air and make a decision,? Ryan said. ?The decision has to be made.?Hughes also picked up a blatant intentional foul near mid-court early in the second half that gave Purdue two free throws and possession of the ball.But even when the Badgers did execute offensively and get an open shot, the ball just wasn?t going in.?If you look at [Michael Flowers] and Marcus (Landry) and some of the looks they had, maybe take four of those shots out and those other shots ? are very makeable,? Ryan continued.Down the stretch the ball didn?t bounce the Badgers? way either. On two shots in the final three-plus minutes of the second half ? once on a nine-foot baseline jumper by Butch and a second time on a wing 3-pointer by Jason Bohannon ? the ball was seemingly halfway through the cylinder before it popped out.?We got good looks, I thought, they just didn?t fall,? Krabbenhoft said. ?Like I said, the game plan was there, and in the second half, I thought we executed a lot better. But they hit some shots and as a team, we really didn?t.?For the game, the Badgers averaged only 0.89 points per possession, well below their target mark of 1.0.?There?s so many other things that we could?ve done, but they?ll see it on the tape,? Ryan said. ?Just fundamental things.?last_img read more